Death By Obit

Bob Brooks, the managing editor of The New & Observer for most of the 1970’s and 1980’s, could not tolerate an error in an obituary.   It was the only time most people’s name appeared in the paper and Brooks hated it when we messed up their obit.

And if we lost an obit?

Unthinkable!

Bob Brooks, at a news budget meeting in the early 1980's.
Bob Brooks, at a news budget meeting in the early 1980’s.

I was the paper’s assistant metro editor for a l-o-n-g eight months and one of my duties was to edited the obits and then moved them from the Metro Desk to the Copy Desk. It was the most important thing I did every day because Bob Brooks told me it was the most important thing I did every day.  I handled obits like my life depended on them because, professionally speaking, it did.

One afternoon when I came to work my boss, Bob Gordon, the metro editor, looked at me like I was a dead man walking. In a quiet voice, almost a whisper, he told me that two Raleigh obituaries had been left out of the final edition that morning. They appeared to have been lost. Brooks wanted an explanation.

The metro editor and I both knew there would be hell to pay over those obits, and I was in the hot seat.

But maybe, just maybe, it wasn’t my fault, maybe it was the Copy Desk’s fault.  Every night I made a list of the obituaries I sent to the Copy Desk  so the first thing I did was check last night’s list. There was no help for me there.  The names of the dead men whose obits were not in the paper were not on the obit list either.  The Copy Desk was off the hook and I was firmly on it.

I looked everywhere for those obituaries. I checked with each obit writer. No one remembered handling them, they didn’t even remember seeing them.

And then a guy at Brown-Wynne Funeral Home called, told me about obits they would send over that evening and then he told me, almost as an afterthought: the obits they were going to bring would included two they should have dropped off yesterday.  Those two obits had been accidentally left on the seat of the car.

Brown-Wynne had not delivered the missing obits!  

Feeling a little too smug at my good fortune I went to Brooks’ office and told him what had happened: I didn’t lose those obits.  Nobody at The N&O had lost them. It was Brown-Wynne’s fault — they’ve admitted it — the funeral home didn’t deliver them.

That good news appeared to have no effect whatsoever on Bob Brooks. He stood up, walked around his desk, got in my face, and this is what he told me, word for word:

“Two people died in Raleigh yesterday and their obituaries were not in The News & Observer this morning. That is never going to happen again. Do you understand me?”

“Yes sir,” I said.

*  *  *

And that’s not all.

State Editor Kerry Sipe was responsible for all of the early edition obits and, on another occasion, I heard Brooks explain to Kerry how important they were.

Kerry was an excellent editor, had to be because he had a tough job. Every afternoon and evening he handled news called in by stringers, some of whom were barely literate in my opinion, from various towns across Eastern North Carolina.  He had to rewrite most of their copy.

One night after the first edition deadline –we called it the  “A” edition– he came over and slumped  in a chair beside my desk.  It had been one of those days, and he was mentally exhausted.

Brooks came over too, to have a word with Kerry.

“Two Raleigh obits got left out of the ‘A” edition,” Brooks said.  When a Raleigh resident had family Down East we ran their obituary in the early, out of town, editions.

Kerry replied, “Yea, I could foresee…

Brooks cut him off mid-sentence.

“Well, let me tell you what I can foresee,” our managing editor said to this man, who had just finished translating reams of gibberish into coherent stories –on deadline.  “I foresee that if that ever happens again we’re going to have a new state editor.”

* * *

Brooks was fine newspaperman, a straight arrow  who could spot a hole in a story from across the room.   I liked him a lot. But he had one blind spot — obituaries.

Coming Monday: You’re Not Bo!

Goodbye Charlotte, Part 3 of 3

Wednesday afternoon, May 12, 1971

The Charlotte News should not have retracted, corrected and apologized for a story I had written about the wrongful arrest of a doctor for a minor boating violation, and I was determined to prove it. 

The retraction said my story had implied that the clerk of court was concealing information and may have left the impression that the clerk of court was responsible for issuance of the warrant.

Neither implication was correct,” the retraction said.

R. Max Blackburn, the clerk of Superior Court, wasn’t talking but I had covered his office for several years and I had friends in the courthouse. I called in every green stamp I owned and, by late that afternoon, I knew what had happened — and I went to see the clerk.

Thursday afternoon, May 13

The headline on my follow-up story, published in The Charlotte News the day after the retraction, said: Superior Court Clerk Takes Responsibility For Doctor Arrest

The first two graphs of a story that explain exactly what had happened.
The first two graphs of a story that explained exactly what had happened.

“Clerk of Superior Court R. Max Blackburn said yesterday that his office is responsible for a clerical error that led to the arrest of a Charlotte doctor.”

The story also said:

“I plan to visit the doctor personally and make my personal apology to him,” Blackburn said.

The Charlotte News did not retract the retraction of my original story, of course, and Editor Perry Morgan, who had ordered the retraction, did not apologize to me.  It wouldn’t have mattered.  I was done with The Charlotte News.

I called The News & Observer that Thursday afternoon and was invited to Raleigh the next day for an interview.

Friday, May 14: I drove to Raleigh, talked with the managing editor, Woodrow Price, and the executive editor, Claude Sitton, and left with a job offer.

Monday, May 17: I resigned from The Charlotte News, ending a relationship dating back more than a decade.

Postscript: Perry Morgan, editor of The Newshad recruited me, mentored me, and promoted me — he liked me. He had no personal or professional reason to retract my story. But he did. And if he hadn’t I would have stayed in Charlotte and missed out on a boatload of blessings. I believe the retraction was God’s doing: If He couldn’t lead me out of Charlotte to a better life  — The N&O had tried twice to recruit me — He would drive me out of Charlotte.

Consider this:

**The state government complex, a target-rich environment for an investigative reporter, was a five-minute walk from my new office.  And, unlike The Charlotte News, if I could find it and prove it, The N&O would publish it.

**The N&O had three times the circulation of The Charlotte News – and paid much better.  To support my family I never had to work a second job again.

**I won a Pulitzer Prize at The N&O.

**The Charlotte News went out of business.

Coming Friday: Run Off The Mountain